Exact source claims and related context are never blended together.
This hierarchy shows why a use appears beside the preparation. The strongest relationship comes first; contextual links remain explicitly labeled.
This use is documented for the same plant in a separate source; it is not claimed by this preparation passage.
↗ Related plant contextThis use is documented for the same plant in a separate source; it is not claimed by this preparation passage.
↗ Related plant contextThis use is documented for the same plant in a separate source; it is not claimed by this preparation passage.
↗ Related plant contextThis use is documented for the same plant in a separate source; it is not claimed by this preparation passage.
↗ Related plant contextThis use is documented for the same plant in a separate source; it is not claimed by this preparation passage.
↗ Related plant contextThis use is documented for the same plant in a separate source; it is not claimed by this preparation passage.
↗Historical preparation record
This formula was extracted from a rights-cleared historical primary source and is preserved as an archival record. Historical terminology, identity, strength and safety require modern interpretation.
Source: Companion to the latest edition of the British pharmacopoeia [electronic resource] : comparing the strength of its various preparations with those of the United States and other foreign pharmacopoeias to which are added non-official preparations and practical hints on prescribing by Squire, Peter (1877), materia-99-4.
Ingredients or materials as extracted
- Yellow Cinchona Bark: Dose. — 1 to 4 minims in pill, with powdered Mastich, or in sugar, or emulsion. (In all the Pharmacopoeias.) PULVIS CINNAMOMI COMPOSITUS.
Method as extracted
- Mix according to the source passage: Dose. — 1 to 4 minims in pill, with powdered Mastich, or in sugar, or emulsion. (In all the Pharmacopoeias.) PULVIS CINNAMOMI COMPOSITUS.
Automated publication scope
This archival record passed the strict source, formula, botanical identity and hazard gates. Automatic publication confirms record integrity and internal botanical linking; it does not establish clinical effectiveness or modern dosing safety.
Professional review advised
Professional review is advised before any practical use of this preparation.
- Historical formula: ingredient identity, strength, contamination risk and terminology may differ from modern practice.
- Do not use this record as dosage or treatment guidance. Every ingredient, route and contraindication requires qualified editorial verification.
- The historical use wording does not establish modern clinical effectiveness.
Primary wording. Visible interpretation. No borrowed certainty.
The public record separates the historical passage, structured preparation data, use relationship and modern safety boundary. Same-plant context is presented as context, never as proof that this preparation was intended for that use.
Primary and supporting references
- Companion to the latest edition of the British pharmacopoeia [electronic resource] : comparing the strength of its various preparations with those of the United States and other foreign pharmacopoeias to which are added non-official preparations and practical hints on prescribing — Companion to the latest edition of the British pharmacopoeia [electronic resource] : comparing the strength of its various preparations with those of the United States and other foreign pharmacopoeias to which are added non-official preparations and practPrimary source for the extracted ingredients and method at materia-99-4.