Exact source claims and related context are never blended together.
This hierarchy shows why a use appears beside the preparation. The strongest relationship comes first; contextual links remain explicitly labeled.
The preparation remains searchable as an archival method record without an invented indication.
Automated live-review record
This formula was extracted automatically from a historical source and published directly for live editorial inspection. It may contain OCR, title, botanical-identity, ingredient, structure or safety errors. Do not use it as treatment, dosage or self-care guidance.
Source: Companion to the latest edition of the British PharmacopÅia [electronic resource] : comparing the strength of its various preparations by Squire, Peter; Squire, Peter Wyatt, Sir, 1847-1919 (1899), paragraph-6591.
Ingredients or materials as extracted
- 100 parts of this Ointment contain 7 § parts of Opium
- The Ointment might be made direct by mixing 15 grains of Opium and 37 grains of Galls with 148 grains of Benzoated Lard. (Not in the other Pharmacopoeias. ) Wot Official
Method as extracted
Live editorial status
This record was published without a human-review gate by site policy. Automated flags at publication: no primary ingredient taxon link, quality score below 70, promotion title hygiene failed, missing instructions, not herbal remedy, not marked promotable, critical hazard archive only. Publication makes the source extraction inspectable; it does not verify identity, completeness, efficacy or safety.
Toxic / do not self-use
Do not self-use. The record remains public for historical, botanical and hazard research.
- Unreviewed automated import: this record is public for live editorial inspection and has not passed manual identity, formula or safety review.
- Historical formula: ingredient identity, strength, contamination risk and terminology may differ from modern practice.
- Do not use this record as dosage or treatment guidance. Every ingredient, route and contraindication requires qualified editorial verification.
- The historical use wording does not establish modern clinical effectiveness.
- Automated review flags: controlled or narcotic.
Primary wording. Visible interpretation. No borrowed certainty.
The public record separates the historical passage, structured preparation data, use relationship and modern safety boundary. Same-plant context is presented as context, never as proof that this preparation was intended for that use.
Primary and supporting references
- Companion to the latest edition of the British PharmacopÅia [electronic resource] : comparing the strength of its various preparations — Companion to the latest edition of the British PharmacopÅia [electronic resource] : comparing the strength of its various preparationsPrimary source for the extracted ingredients and method at paragraph-6591.