Exact source claims and related context are never blended together.
This hierarchy shows why a use appears beside the preparation. The strongest relationship comes first; contextual links remain explicitly labeled.
The preparation remains searchable as an archival method record without an invented indication.
Automated live-review record
This formula was extracted automatically from a historical source and published directly for live editorial inspection. It may contain OCR, title, botanical-identity, ingredient, structure or safety errors. Do not use it as treatment, dosage or self-care guidance.
Source: The London dispensatory by Thomson, Anthony Todd, 1778-1849. n 88067930 (1811), narrative-offset-1912047.
Ingredients or materials as extracted
- Roses: of the dried petals of the red rose, half an ounce 5 boiling water, two pints and a half (three pounds by measure, Dub.); diluted sulphuric acid, three fluid drachms (three drachms by weight, Dub.) ; refined sugar, an ounce and a half
Method as extracted
- Infuse according to the source passage: The-dose of the former may be from f3j to f3iv, and of the latter half the quantity, united with neutral — salts or aromatics, as circumstances may direct. % INFUSUM ROSE. Infusion of Roses. “¢ Take of the dried petals of the red rose, half an ounce 5 boiling water, two pints and a half (three pounds by measure, Dub.); diluted sulphuric acid, three fluid drachms (three drachms by weight, Dub.) ; refined sugar, an ounce and a half.
Live editorial status
This record was published without a human-review gate by site policy. Automated flags at publication: no primary ingredient taxon link, title ingredient mismatch, not marked promotable, critical hazard archive only. Publication makes the source extraction inspectable; it does not verify identity, completeness, efficacy or safety.
Professional review advised
Professional review is advised before any practical use of this preparation.
- Unreviewed automated import: this record is public for live editorial inspection and has not passed manual identity, formula or safety review.
- Historical formula: ingredient identity, strength, contamination risk and terminology may differ from modern practice.
- Do not use this record as dosage or treatment guidance. Every ingredient, route and contraindication requires qualified editorial verification.
- The historical use wording does not establish modern clinical effectiveness.
- Automated review flags: corrosive or toxic chemical.
Primary wording. Visible interpretation. No borrowed certainty.
The public record separates the historical passage, structured preparation data, use relationship and modern safety boundary. Same-plant context is presented as context, never as proof that this preparation was intended for that use.
Primary and supporting references
- The London dispensatory — The London dispensatoryPrimary source for the extracted ingredients and method at narrative-offset-1912047.