Exact source claims and related context are never blended together.
This hierarchy shows why a use appears beside the preparation. The strongest relationship comes first; contextual links remain explicitly labeled.
The preparation remains searchable as an archival method record without an invented indication.
Automated live-review record
This formula was extracted automatically from a historical source and published directly for live editorial inspection. It may contain OCR, title, botanical-identity, ingredient, structure or safety errors. Do not use it as treatment, dosage or self-care guidance.
Source: A translation of the pharmacopoeia of the Royal College of Physicians, of London. 1824. by Royal College of Physicians of London. n 80046799; Phillips, Richard, 1778-1851. n 88087043; Gray, Samuel Frederick, 1766-1828, former owner. Copy 2. UkLW nr 91017757 (1824), monograph-offset-301044-1.
Ingredients or materials as extracted
- Aconite leaves fresh: of Extract of spiked aloe in powder, a pound, Boiling water a gallon
Method as extracted
- Grind according to the source passage: Take of Extract of spiked aloe in powder, a pound, Boiling water a gallon ;
Live editorial status
This record was published without a human-review gate by site policy. Automated flags at publication: no primary ingredient taxon link, title ingredient mismatch, quality score below 70, not marked promotable, critical hazard archive only. Publication makes the source extraction inspectable; it does not verify identity, completeness, efficacy or safety.
Professional review advised
Professional review is advised before any practical use of this preparation.
- Unreviewed automated import: this record is public for live editorial inspection and has not passed manual identity, formula or safety review.
- Historical formula: ingredient identity, strength, contamination risk and terminology may differ from modern practice.
- Do not use this record as dosage or treatment guidance. Every ingredient, route and contraindication requires qualified editorial verification.
- The historical use wording does not establish modern clinical effectiveness.
- Automated review flags: high risk botanical.
Primary wording. Visible interpretation. No borrowed certainty.
The public record separates the historical passage, structured preparation data, use relationship and modern safety boundary. Same-plant context is presented as context, never as proof that this preparation was intended for that use.
Primary and supporting references
- A translation of the pharmacopoeia of the Royal College of Physicians, of London. 1824. — A translation of the pharmacopoeia of the Royal College of Physicians, of London. 1824.Primary source for the extracted ingredients and method at monograph-offset-301044-1.