Exact source claims and related context are never blended together.
This hierarchy shows why a use appears beside the preparation. The strongest relationship comes first; contextual links remain explicitly labeled.
Automated live-review record
This formula was extracted automatically from a historical source and published directly for live editorial inspection. It may contain OCR, title, botanical-identity, ingredient, structure or safety errors. Do not use it as treatment, dosage or self-care guidance.
Historical use wording: dysentery
Source: The book of health; a compendium of domestic medicine (1840), narrative-offset-571263.
Ingredients or materials as extracted
- JALAP: When administered for dysentery, or looseness, the best method is to give it in three or four grain pills, every four or five hours; but if it be wanted to bring on a plentiful perspiration, ten grains is a proper dose COMPOUND POWDER OF JALAP.
Method as extracted
- Grind according to the source passage: When administered for dysentery, or looseness, the best method is to give it in three or four grain pills, every four or five hours; but if it be wanted to bring on a plentiful perspiration, ten grains is a proper dose COMPOUND POWDER OF JALAP.
Live editorial status
This record was published without a human-review gate by site policy. Automated flags at publication: no primary ingredient taxon link, title ingredient mismatch, quality score below 70, not herbal remedy, not marked promotable, critical hazard archive only. Publication makes the source extraction inspectable; it does not verify identity, completeness, efficacy or safety.
Professional review advised
Professional review is advised before any practical use of this preparation.
- Unreviewed automated import: this record is public for live editorial inspection and has not passed manual identity, formula or safety review.
- Historical formula: ingredient identity, strength, contamination risk and terminology may differ from modern practice.
- Do not use this record as dosage or treatment guidance. Every ingredient, route and contraindication requires qualified editorial verification.
- The historical use wording does not establish modern clinical effectiveness.
- Automated review flags: high risk botanical.
Primary wording. Visible interpretation. No borrowed certainty.
The public record separates the historical passage, structured preparation data, use relationship and modern safety boundary. Same-plant context is presented as context, never as proof that this preparation was intended for that use.
Primary and supporting references
- The book of health; a compendium of domestic medicine — The book of health; a compendium of domestic medicinePrimary source for the extracted ingredients and method at narrative-offset-571263.