Exact source claims and related context are never blended together.
This hierarchy shows why a use appears beside the preparation. The strongest relationship comes first; contextual links remain explicitly labeled.
The preparation remains searchable as an archival method record without an invented indication.
Automated live-review record
This formula was extracted automatically from a historical source and published directly for live editorial inspection. It may contain OCR, title, botanical-identity, ingredient, structure or safety errors. Do not use it as treatment, dosage or self-care guidance.
Source: Companion to the latest edition of the British Pharmacopoeia : comparing the strength of its various preparations with those of the London, Edinburgh, Dublin, United States, ... by Squire Peter, d.1884; Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh (1873), materia-167-3.
Ingredients or materials as extracted
- Sulphate of Potash: Dover was prepared by fusing 4 parts of Nitrate of Potash with 4 of Sulphate of Potash together, and reducing the product to fine powder ; to this was added 1 of Ipeca- cuanha, 1 of Opium, and 1 of Liquorice.
Method as extracted
- Grind according to the source passage: Dover was prepared by fusing 4 parts of Nitrate of Potash with 4 of Sulphate of Potash together, and reducing the product to fine powder ; to this was added 1 of Ipeca- cuanha, 1 of Opium, and 1 of Liquorice.
Live editorial status
This record was published without a human-review gate by site policy. Automated flags at publication: non botanical title identity, quality score below 70, primary taxon poison flag, not marked promotable, critical hazard archive only. Publication makes the source extraction inspectable; it does not verify identity, completeness, efficacy or safety.
Toxic / do not self-use
Do not self-use. The record remains public for historical, botanical and hazard research.
- Unreviewed automated import: this record is public for live editorial inspection and has not passed manual identity, formula or safety review.
- Historical formula: ingredient identity, strength, contamination risk and terminology may differ from modern practice.
- Do not use this record as dosage or treatment guidance. Every ingredient, route and contraindication requires qualified editorial verification.
- The historical use wording does not establish modern clinical effectiveness.
- Automated review flags: controlled or narcotic.
Primary wording. Visible interpretation. No borrowed certainty.
The public record separates the historical passage, structured preparation data, use relationship and modern safety boundary. Same-plant context is presented as context, never as proof that this preparation was intended for that use.
Primary and supporting references
- Companion to the latest edition of the British Pharmacopoeia : comparing the strength of its various preparations with those of the London, Edinburgh, Dublin, United States, ... — Companion to the latest edition of the British Pharmacopoeia : comparing the strength of its various preparations with those of the London, Edinburgh, Dublin, United States, ...Primary source for the extracted ingredients and method at materia-167-3.